Airfoil 5.1.1

You can download legacy versions of our software from this page for use on older operating systems. Please note, these legacy versions are not supported.

• Airfoil 5.1.1 Vs
• Airfoil 5.1.1 Samsung
• Airfoil 5.1.1 Update

Note that a valid license key is required to unlock the full versions of this software. For more details on legacy versions, including information on purchasing, see this page.

4.3 Development of Wind Turbine Airfoils. 4.3.1 A Brief Historical Review of Wind Turbine Airfoils. 4.3.2 Catalog of Wind Turbine Airfoils. 5 Unsteady Aerodynamics and 3-D Correction Models for Airfoil Characteristics. 5.1 Unsteady Aerodynamics on Wind Turbine Blades. 5.1.1 Fundamentals of Unsteady Aerodynamics. What's New in Version 5.1.1: ・Major Enhancement Instant On has been updated to version 8.3, with preliminary support for macOS 10.12 (Sierra). ・Bug Fix The Advanced Speaker Options window didn't properly reload after unhiding a speaker that isn't currently available, but now it does. Design of Airfoils for Wind Turbine Blades. Airfoil testing. 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5-50 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400.

Airfoil for Mac

Airfoil for Mac 5

Airfoil allows you to send any audio to AirPort Express units, Apple TVs, and even other Macs and PCs, all in sync!It’s your audio – everywhere. With Airfoil you can take audio from any application and send to your AirPort Express units, as well as Apple TVs, and even other Macs and PCs running Airfoil Speakers! Test Case CL1 – Heaving and Pitching Airfoil Per-Olof Persson and Chris Fidkowski UC Berkeley and U. Michigan 5th International Workshop on High-Order CFD Methods.

Mac OS X 10.11: ↓ 5.8.6
Mac OS X 10.10:↓ 5.8.2
Mac OS X 10.9:↓ 5.6.0

Note: Airfoil for Mac 5 is the current version of the software. Users of older versions are eligible to upgrade to version 5 at a substantial discount.

Airfoil for Mac 4

Final Version 4 (Mac OS X 10.11, 10.10, 10.9):↓ 4.9.2
Mac OS X 10.8, 10.7:↓ 4.8.14
Mac OS X 10.6:↓ 4.7.6

Note: The code portion of Airfoil for Mac 4 license keys begins with KUTA-. If you have an Airfoil for Mac 4 license key, you can upgrade now.

Airfoil for Mac 3

Final Version 3 (Mac OS X 10.6, 10.5): ↓ 3.5.7
Mac OS X 10.4: ↓ 3.3.2

Note: The code portion of Airfoil for Mac 3 license keys begins with TX40-. If you have an Airfoil for Mac 3 license key, you can upgrade now.

Airfoil for Mac 2

Final Version 2 (Mac OS X 10.5, 10.4): ↓ 2.1.1
Mac OS X 10.3: ↓ 2.0.8
Mac OS X 10.2: ↓ 1.0.6

Note: The code portion of Airfoil for Mac 2 (and 1) license keys begins with SSME-. If you have an Airfoil for Mac 2/1 license key, you can upgrade now.

Airfoil Satellite

Airfoil Satellite for Mac

Mac OS X 10.11: ↓ 5.8.6
Mac OS X 10.10: ↓ 5.8.2
Mac OS X 10.9: ↓ 5.6.0

Note: Airfoil Satellite for Mac is the current receiving and remote control application for Airfoil. It replaces the older Airfoil Speakers for Mac.

Airfoil Speakers for Mac

Final Version (MacOS 10.11, 10.10, 10.9): ↓ 4.9.2
Mac OS X 10.8, 10.7: ↓ 4.8.14
Mac OS X 10.6: ↓ 4.7.6
Mac OS X 10.5: ↓ 3.5.7
Mac OS X 10.4: ↓ 3.3.2

Note: Airfoil Speakers for Mac has been superseded by Airfoil Satellite for Mac on Mac OS X 10.9 and higher.

Airfoil Satellite for Windows

Because Airfoil Satellite for Windows 5 has not removed support for any OS versions, no Legacy versions of the app are needed at this time.

Note: Airfoil Satellite for Windows is the current receiving and remote control application for Airfoil. It replaces the older Airfoil Speakers for Windows.

Airfoil Speakers for Windows

Final Version (Windows 10, Windows 8.1/8, Windows 7, Windows Vista): ↓ 3.6.7
Windows XP: ↓ 3.5

Note: Airfoil Speakers for Windows has been superseded by Airfoil Satellite for Windows on Windows 7 and higher.

Airfoil Satellite for iOS

Because Airfoil Satellite for iOS has not removed support for any OS versions, no Legacy versions are needed at this time.

Note: Airfoil Satellite for iOS is the current receiving and remote control application for Airfoil. It replaces the older Airfoil Speakers Touch.

Airfoil Speakers Touch

Users running iOS 4 through iOS 6 can still download “Airfoil Speakers Touch” by searching for it in the iOS App Store.

Note: Airfoil Speakers Touch has been superseded by Airfoil Satellite for iOS on iOS 7 and higher.

OmmWriter is a tool that makes writing a pleasure again, allowing users to be alone with their thoughts; to concentrate and to write without distractions. The secret to OmmWriter lies in its simplicity and apparent lack of functionality. Nch zulu maters 5.02. More than a word processor, OmmWriter is a place to get inspired.

Airfoil Satellite for Android

Because Airfoil Satellite for Android has not removed support for any OS versions, no Legacy versions are needed at this time.

Note: Airfoil Satellite for Android is the current receiving and remote control application for Airfoil. It replaces the older Airfoil Speakers for Android.

Airfoil Speakers for Android

Final Version (Android 2.3 - 5.1.1): ↓ 1.0.3

Note: Airfoil Speakers for Android has been superseded by Airfoil Satellite for Android on Android 6 and higher.

Audio Hijack

Audio Hijack 3

Mac OS X 10.11: ↓ 3.5.7
Mac OS X 10.10: ↓ 3.5.3
Mac OS X 10.9: ↓ 3.3.4

Note: Audio Hijack 3 is the latest version of the software. Users of any older version of Audio Hijack, including Audio Hijack Pro, are eligible to upgrade to version 3 at a substantial discount.

Audio Hijack Pro 2

Final Version 2 (Mac OS X 10.11, 10.10, 10.9): ↓ 2.11.6
Mac OS X 10.8, 10.7: ↓ 2.11.4
Mac OS X 10.6: ↓ 2.10.7
Mac OS X 10.5: ↓ 2.9.9a
Mac OS X 10.4: ↓ 2.9.2
Mac OS X 10.3: ↓ 2.7.3
Mac OS X 10.2: ↓ 2.1.1

Note: The code portion of Audio Hijack Pro 2 license keys begins with IPRT3-. If you have an Audio Hijack Pro 2 license key, you can upgrade now.

Audio Hijack Pro 1

↓ 1.3.2 (PowerPC only)

Note: The code portion of Audio Hijack Pro 1 license keys begins with IPRT2-. If you have an Audio Hijack Pro 1 license key, you can upgrade now.

Audio Hijack

Final Version 2 (Mac OS X 10.6, 10.5, 10.4):↓ 2.2.6
Mac OS X 10.3:↓ 2.2.5
Mac OS X 10.2:↓ 2.2

Note: The code portion of Audio Hijack 2 license keys begins with IPRT-. If you have an Audio Hijack 2 license key, you can upgrade now.

Farrago

Farrago

Mac OS X 10.11: ↓ 1.2.6
Mac OS X 10.10: ↓ 1.2.1

Fission

Fission 2

Mac OS X 10.11: ↓ 2.4.5
Mac OS X 10.10: ↓ 2.4.3
Mac OS X 10.9: ↓ 2.3.1
Mac OS X 10.8, 10.7: ↓ 2.2.4
Mac OS X 10.6: ↓ 2.1.3

Note: Fission 2 is the current version of the software. Users of older versions are eligible to upgrade to version 2 at a substantial discount.

Fission 1

Final Version 1 (Mac OS X 10.8, 10.7, 10.6):↓ 1.6.12
Mac OS X 10.5:↓ 1.6.10
Mac OS X 10.4:↓ 1.6.8

Note: The code portion of Fission 1 license keys begins with KRBA-. If you have a Fission 1 license key, you can upgrade now.

Loopback

Loopback 2

Mac OS X 10.11: ↓ 2.0.1

Note: Loopback 2 is the current version of the software. Users of older versions are eligible to upgrade to version 2 at a substantial discount.

Loopback 1

Final Version 1 (MacOS 10.14, 10.13, 10.12, 10.11):↓ 1.2.1
Mac OS X 10.10: ↓ 1.2.0
Mac OS X 10.9: ↓ 1.1.2

Note: The code portion of Loopback 1 license keys begins with CIRC-. If you have a Loopback 1 license key, you can upgrade now.

Piezo

Piezo

Mac OS X 10.11:↓ 1.6.0
Mac OS X 10.10:↓ 1.5.9
Mac OS X 10.9:↓ 1.5.2
Mac OS X 10.8, 10.7:↓ 1.2.8
Mac OS X 10.6: ↓ 1.2.2

Note: Piezo is no longer distributed through the Mac App Store. Users who purchased via the Mac App Store can transition to the direct version free of charge.

SoundSource

SoundSource 4

Mac OS X 10.11: ↓ 4.1.2

Note: SoundSource 4 is the current version of the software. Users of older versions are eligible to upgrade to version 4 at a discount.

SoundSource 3

Final Version 3 (MacOS 10.14, 10.13, 10.12, 10.11):↓ 3.1.2
Mac OS X 10.10: ↓ 3.1.0

Note: SoundSource 3 included the functionality of both the old SoundSource and the now-retired LineIn application. See this article for more details.

SoundSource 2

Final Version 2 (Mac OS X 10.7, 10.6):↓ 2.5.1
Mac OS X 10.5:↓ 2.5.0
Mac OS X 10.4:↓ 2.0.0
Mac OS X 10.3:↓ 1.3.0
Mac OS X 10.2:↓ 1.0.5

Note: After several years off, SoundSource has come out of retirement.

Retired Applications

The following applications have been permanently retired. They are no longer for sale, and are provided solely for customers who purchased them while they were still in development. You can learn more about these applications here.

Airfoil for Windows

Final Version (Windows 10, 8/8.1, 7):↓ 5.7.0
Final Version of Airfoil for Windows 3 (Windows 10, Windows 8.1/8, Windows 7, Windows Vista): ↓ 3.6.7
Windows XP:↓ 3.5
Windows 2000:↓ 2.5.1

Note:Airfoil Satellite for Windows remains in development, and enables Windows machines to receive audio transmitted by Airfoil for Mac.

Airfoil Remote

Airfoil Remote is no longer for sale. Previous purchasers can still download it from the “Purchased” section of the Updates tab in the iOS App Store app.

Note: Airfoil Remote has been superseded by Airfoil Satellite for iOS.

Airfoil Video Player

Final Version (Mac OS X 10.11, 10.10, 10.9): ↓ 4.9.2

Detour

Final Version (Mac OS X 10.3): ↓ 1.5.5
Mac OS X 10.2: ↓ 1.5.3
(PowerPC only)

Intermission

Final Version (Mac OS X 10.11, 10.10, and 10.9): ↓ 1.1.5
Mac OS X 10.8, 10.7: ↓ 1.1.3

LineIn

Final Version (MacOS 10.12, 10.11, 10.10, 10.9, 10.8, 10.7):↓ 2.3
Mac OS X 10.6:↓ 2.1.1
Mac OS X 10.5, 10.4:↓ 2.0.3
Mac OS X 10.3:↓ 2.0.2

Note: LineIn's play-thru functionality can best be replicated with Audio Hijack.

MakeiPhoneRingtone

Final Version (MacOS 10.12, 10.11, 10.10, 10.9, 10.8, 10.7):↓ 1.3.5
Mac OS X 10.6, 10.5:↓ 1.3.3
Mac OS X 10.4:↓ 1.3.2

MemoryCell

Mac OS X 10.5, 10.4:↓ 2.1
Mac OS X 10.3:↓ 2.0.1

Airfoil 5.1.1 Vs

Nicecast

Final Version (MacOS 10.13, 10.12, 10.11, 10.10):↓ 1.11.13
Mac OS X 10.9: ↓ 1.11.11
Mac OS X 10.8, 10.7: ↓ 1.11.5
Mac OS X 10.6: ↓ 1.10.8
Mac OS X 10.5: ↓ 1.9.12a
Mac OS X 10.4: ↓ 1.9.7
Mac OS X 10.3: ↓ 1.8.6
Mac OS X 10.2: ↓ 1.6.1

PongSaver

Final Version (MacOS 10.12, 10.11, 10.10, 10.9, 10.8, 10.7):↓ 2.1.1
Mac OS X 10.6:↓ 2.0.0
Mac OS X 10.5, 10.4, 10.3:↓ 1.1.1

Note: For those interested still interested in PongSaver, former Rogue Amoeba employee and original developer Mike Ash has taken over upkeep.

Pulsar

Final Version (Mac OS X 10.8, 10.7, 10.6):↓ 2.3.4

Note: Because Pulsar relied on third-party web services which are now deprecated, it will no longer function at all at this point.

Radioshift

Final Version (Mac OS X 10.7, 10.6):↓ 1.6.8
Mac OS X 10.5:↓ 1.6.4
Mac OS X 10.4:↓ 1.1.4

Note: Because Radioshift relied on third-party web services which are now deprecated, it will no longer function at all at this point.

Radioshift Touch

Radioshift Touch is no longer for sale. Previous purchasers can still download it from the “Purchased” section of the Updates tab in the iOS App Store app.

Note: Because Radioshift Touch relied on third-party web services which are now deprecated, it will no longer function at all at this point.

Mohamed A. Fouad Kandil, Abdelrady Okasha Elnady

Mechatronics Department, Faculty of Engineering, October 6 University, Egypt

Correspondence to: Mohamed A. Fouad Kandil, Mechatronics Department, Faculty of Engineering, October 6 University, Egypt.

Email:

Copyright © 2017 Scientific & Academic Publishing. All Rights Reserved.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Abstract

In this research, CFD analysis of the two-dimensional subsonic flow over a GOE 387 airfoil at various angles of attack and operating at a Reynolds number of 3 x10⁵ is presented. Pressure distribution, Pressure Coefficient (C_p), Moment Coefficient (C_m) Lift Coefficient (C_l), and Drag Coefficient (C_d) are determined. The geometry of the airfoil is created using ANSYS Design Modeler. CFD analysis is carried out using FLUENT 17.2 at various angles of attack from -5° to 20°. Pressure distributions over GOE-387 airfoil for different angles of attack are presented. Moment coefficients and pressure coefficients are plotted against the angle of attack. C_l-C_d graph is plotted.

Keywords: Airfoil, Angle of Attack, CFD, Moment Coefficient, Pressure Coefficient, Lift, Drag

Cite this paper: Mohamed A. Fouad Kandil, Abdelrady Okasha Elnady, Performance of GOE-387 Airfoil Using CFD, International Journal of Aerospace Sciences, Vol. 5 No. 1, 2017, pp. 1-7. doi: 10.5923/j.aerospace.20170501.01.

1. Introduction

In the early 1800s, Sir George Cayley discovered that a curved surface produced more lift than a similar sized flat plate. What aviation pioneers discovered, which still holds true today, is that the most efficient way to do this is to use a curved, streamlined shape—the airfoil.Airfoil is defined as the cross-section of a body that is placed in an airstream in order to generate useful aerodynamic force. The Wright brothers, many of the early designers used “eyeball engineering” in developing or copying the airfoil shape used on their airplanes. From about 1912, airfoil development and research moved to the wind tunnel laboratories found at the University of Göttingen in Germany, the Royal Aircraft Factory in the United Kingdom, and the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA) in the United States. Since then, the wind tunnel, complex mathematics, and the computer have all played important roles in airfoil development.For the last three decades, Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) has fascinated researchers, as it is a fast, accurate and reliable method of analyzing the variation of hydrodynamic properties of the flow over and within a body. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) is a branch of fluid mechanics that uses numerical methods and algorithms to solve complex problems involving fluid flow.Some of the recent interesting work in the study of airfoils has been discussed below. Patel, Karna S., et al [1] have obtained the drag and lift forces using CFD. Kevadiya, Mayurkumar [2] investigated NACA 4412 airfoil at various angles of attack from 0° to 12° using CFD analysis. Variations of pressure coefficient are plotted in form of contour for 1 ×105 Reynolds number.Patil et al. [3] investigated the effect of low Reynolds number on lift and drag for the wind turbine blade. They found out as Reynolds number increases, lift and drag forces increases. Haque et al. [4] conducted various experimental studies to understand the effects of Reynolds number and angle of attack in flow analysis. Yao et al. [5] studied the aerodynamic performance of wind turbine airfoils and compared the numerical results with experimental data. The effect of transonic flow over an airfoil has been studied and a comparative analysis has been was done to analyze the variation of the angle of attack and Mach number [6]. Kandil and Elnady present a CFD analysis of GOE 387 airfoil [7].In the light of the review of the existing literature, the present study aims to analyze the flow field for GOE 387 airfoil at various angles of attack with constant Reynolds number of 3 x10⁵. The flow was obtained by solving the steady-state governing equations of continuity and momentum conservation with Transition k-kl-omega turbulence model.Pitching moment coefficient (C_m):The pitching moment coefficient (C_m) is the moment (or torque) produced by the aerodynamic force on the airfoil if that aerodynamic force is considered to be applied, not at the center of pressure, but at the aerodynamic center of the airfoil.where M is the pitching moment, q is the dynamic pressure, S is the wing area, and c is the length of the chord of the airfoil. C_m is a dimensionless coefficient so the consistent unit must be used for M, q, S, and c.Pressure Coefficient C_p:C_p is the difference between local static pressure and free-stream (at ∞) static pressure, nondimensionalized by the free-stream dynamic pressure. At any point in the flow where the local pressure coefficient C_p is defined asThe Total or Stagnation Upstream Pressure P_T is the sum of the static and dynamic pressure at that point according to Bernoulli's equation:Thus, C_P may also be written in terms of the differential pressures asC_P, at the airfoil stagnation point, is unity.

2. Geometry and Mesh Generation

The geometry of GOE 387 is shown in Figure 1. For discretization of the computational domain, an unstructured mesh with the body of influence centered on the airfoil and rectangular path were selected. The mesh used for the analysis is shown in Figures 2 and 3, Pressure based steady-state solver with Transition k-kl-omega turbulence model is used for analysis.

Figure 1. Geometry of GOE 387 Airfoil

Figure 2. Completed Mesh

Figure 3. Mesh of the computational domain

3. Inputs and Boundary Conditions

The problem consists of flow around an airfoil at various angles of attack (-5, 0, 5, 10, 15, 20 degrees). The inputs and boundary conditions are presented in Table 1.

Table 1. Inputs and boundary conditions

4. Results and Discussion

4.1. Contours of Pressure Magnitude

The contours of pressure magnitude obtained for various angles of attack from CFD simulations are shown in Figures 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9. The flow accelerates on the upper side of the airfoil and the velocity of flow decreases along the lower side, according to Bernoulli’s principle the upper surface will experience low pressure and the lower surface will experience higher pressure. As the pressure on the lower surface of the airfoil is greater than that of the incoming flow stream, the airfoil is effectively pushed upward normal to the incoming flow stream.

Figure 4. Pressure contours at -5 degrees of angle of attack

Figure 5. Pressure contours at 0 degrees of angle of attack

Figure 6. Pressure contours at 5 degrees of angle of attack

Figure 7. Pressure contours at 10 degrees of angle of attack

Figure 8. Pressure contours at 15 degrees of angle of attack

Figure 9. Pressure contours at 20 degrees of angle of attack

4.2. Distribution of Pressure Coefficient

The distribution of pressure coefficient of GOE 387 airfoil under different angles of attack is shown in the following Figures 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15. It can be seen that the pressure coefficient varied largely under different attack angle. The pressure coefficient of the airfoil’s upper surface was negative and the lower surface was positive, thus the lift force of the airfoil is in the upward direction. Larger the attack angle, greater is the difference of pressure coefficient between the lower and upper surface. We can also see that the coefficient of pressure difference is much larger on the front edge, while on the rear edge it was much lower, thus indicating that the lift force of the airfoil is mainly generated from the front edge.

Figure 10. Pressure coefficient at -5° angle of attack

Figure 11. Pressure coefficient at 0° of attack

Figure 12. Pressure coefficient at 5° angle of attack

Figure 13. Pressure coefficient at 10° angle of attack

Figure 14. Pressure coefficient at 15° angle of attack

Airfoil 5.1.1 Samsung

Figure 15. Pressure coefficient at 20° angle of attack

4.3. Curve of Moment Coefficient vs. Angle of Attack

The Moment coefficient is computed at aerodynamic center for various angles of attack using the Transition k-kl-omega model. The results are tabulated in Table 2 and shown in Figure 16.

Table 2. Moment Coefficients Cm with Angle of Attack

Figure 16. Curve of Moment Coefficient vs. Angle of Attack

4.4. Lift and Drag Characteristics

Lift drag characteristics of the GOE-387 airfoil are obtained by plotting C_l against C_d as shown in Figure 17. From this figure, the lift and drag characteristics are summarized as follows:

Figure 17. Curve of Lift Coefficient vs. Drag Coefficient

5. Conclusions

Airfoil 5.1.1 Update

With the help of CFD software Ansys-Fluent, successful analysis of the aerodynamic performance of GOE 387 airfoil has been carried at various angles of attack (-5, 0, 5, 10, 15, 20 degrees) with constant Reynolds number (3 x10⁵) using the Transition k-kl-omega turbulence model. The pressure coefficient of the airfoil’s upper surface was negative and the lower surface was positive, thus the lift force of the airfoil is in the upward direction. The coefficient of pressure difference is much larger on the front edge, while on the rear edge it was much lower. The moment and force reference point is taken at 25% of Mean Aerodynamic Cord, the magnitude of the aerodynamic moment remains nearly constant when the angle of attack changes.

References

[1]	Patel, Karna S., et al. 'CFD Analysis of an Aerofoil.' International Journal of Engineering Research 3.3 (2014): 154-158.‏
[2]	Kevadiya, Mayurkumar. 'CFD Analysis of Pressure Coefficient for NACA 4412.' International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology, Chennai 4.5 (2013): 2041-2043.‏
[3]	Bhushan S. Patil, Hitesh R. Thakare, Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis of Wind Turbine Blade at Various Angles of Attack and different Reynolds Number, Procedia Engineering, 127(2015), 1363-1369 M. Wegmuller, J. P. von der Weid, P. Oberson, and N. Gisin, “High resolution fiber distributed measurements with coherent OFDR,” in Proc. ECOC’00, 2000, paper 11.3.4, p. 109.
[4]	Nazmul Haque, Mohammad Ali, Ismat Ara, Experimental Investigation on the performance of NACA 4412 aerofoil with curved leading edge plan form, Procedia Engineering, 105(2015), 232-240 M. Shell. (2002) IEEEtran homepage on CTAN. [Online]. Available: http://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/supported/IEEEtran/.
[5]	Jin Yao, Weibin Yuan, Jianliang Wang, Jianbin Xie, Haifeng Zhou, MingjunPeng, young Sun, Numerical simulation of aerodynamic performance for two-dimensional wind turbine airfoils, Procedia Engineering, 31(2012), 80-86 “PDCA12-70 data sheet,” Opto Speed SA, Mezzovico, Switzerland.
[6]	Novel Kumar Sahu, Mr. Shadab Imam, Analysis of Transonic Flow over an Airfoil NACA0012 using CFD, International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering & Technology, Vol. 2 Issue 4, April 2015 J. Padhye, V. Firoiu, and D. Towsley, “A stochastic model of TCP Reno congestion avoidance and control,” Univ. of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, CMPSCI Tech. Rep. 99-02, 1999.
[7]	Mohamed A. Fouad Kandil, Abdelrady Okasha Elnady, “CFD Analysis of GOE 387Airfoil”, IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering (IOSR-JMCE), Volume 14 - Issue 5, Sep. – Oct. 2017, PP 80-85.